Position on Abortion Durkheim, Marx, and Weber Free Essay Example, 750 words

ï » ¿Sociology Position Paper on Abortion: Durkheim, Marx, and Weber Abortion has become a social dilemma in the last decade. Abortion can be defined as the ending of a pregnancy by removing the embryo or fetus before it is able to survive outside the womb of the mother. The topic is no longer a taboo the way it was some thirty years back. Those who are pro this practice argues that women have a right over their own bodies and should therefore be allowed to make a choice on whether to keep a pregnancy or not. The pro-life on the other hand say that the child is a human being and should therefore not be killed prematurely. Several sociological standpoints have been brought forward to be able to analyze these important social issues. Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim bring out different viewpoints on the issue. This treatise attempts to explain these viewpoints in order come to a conclusion on the most agreeable stand. Karl Marx is known to be the first individual to popularize the conflict theory which with has found widespread application in so ciology (Kornblum, 2009). We will write a custom essay sample on Position on Abortion: Durkheim, Marx, and Weber or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now In the modern society, Marx would come out as a pro- choice person. Despite this being the case, Marxists may not be in support of all cases of abortion. According to Kornblum (2009), there are specific stages of history that occur to open way to other historical events. All these are believed to eventually lead to a flawless society. In one of his works, Karl Marx talked about the struggles that were witnessed between bourgeois and the proletariats. Without this particular struggle, the society may have had no classes. To him, abortion in the society gives the upper class an advantage over the class uprisings. The Marxists are of the opinion that personality and other human values are imparted by the environment in which people live (Babbie, 2005). As such, decisions that people make are not inherent spiritual values or biological processes. With this in mind, they say that the fetus only becomes a person when it is judged by someone who has a high er wisdom. The humanity of a fetus will depend how the mother perceives it and the relationship that exist between them. The mother will only keep the child if she wants to do so, to be able to give it personhood. Max Weber agrees with Karl Marx that human ideas and values are key in bringing social changes as well as economic benefits. In his view, certain people are destined to be the way they are. This is an idea that was based on American capitalism. In the book â€Å"Protestant Ethics and Spirits and Capitalism†, he says that there are some individuals who are, for example, predestined to be saved even before their birth (MeÃ… ¡trović, 2004). Moreover, he argues that there are societies that are destined to be below others in terms of values and economic successes. He however notes that the values in the society result in social changes. On this grounds, it is quite evident that Marx Weber would have supported abortion on the basis of the notion that there are some people who are predestined to live and there are those who are not supposed to live. As such it is not wrong for the mother to decide to terminate a pregnancy for a given reason. Durkheim on the other hand is a supporter of the functionalism theory. He believed that every individual has a role to play for the society to function (Durkheim, 1938). This is a pro-life stand. He argues that each and every aspect of the society has a function that is intended to benefit the members. Durkheim would come out to oppose the practice of abortion since he is a functionalist. He argues that most of the challenges that face the society today like suicide are not caused by the society itself Kornblum (2009). They are as a result of the rapid changes in life. In the case of a pregnancy, the mothers who think about abortion believe that they are solving the problem that they have by killing the unborn. This does not end up that way as it only prevent the unborn from growing up to play his role i n the society. The stance that is taken by Durkheim appears to be the most appropriate one. Women should not be allowed to decide to terminate pregnancy when they want since it will not be correcting anything. Every member of the society including the fetus has a role to play and when they play their roles effectively the society becomes fully functional. References Babbie, E. (2005). The Practice of Social Research. London: Cengage Learning. Durkheim, E. (1938). The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press. Kornblum, W. (2009). Sociology in a Changing World. London: Cengage Learning. MeÃ… ¡trović, S. (2004). Emile Durkheim and the Reformation of Sociology. Lehman: Rowman & Littlefield.

How to Use the Subjunctive With Dès Que

The French term dà ¨s que  is a conjunction that means as soon as. Dà ¨s que does not take the subjunctive. Examples Je lachà ¨terai dà ¨s quil arrivera.Ill buy it as soon as he arrives. Je te donnerais  le livre dà ¨s que  je  le finirai.Ill give you the book as soon as I finish it. As you can see in the examples above, this conjunction is normally followed by the ​future  tense, rather than the present tense.​

DISC Platinum Rule Personality Assessment Free Essays

A good listener, a great companion, trustworthy, and the facility to finish what one started – these are the adjectives used to describe people who characterize the personality of the Steadiness Style. These words describe the strengths of the Steadiness Styles, and depict what characteristics help them in order to accomplish their life goals. If we talk about social interaction and relationships, the Steadiness Styles lead all the other personality styles. We will write a custom essay sample on DISC Platinum Rule Personality Assessment or any similar topic only for you Order Now They are open to intermingling with other people, most often influenced by their being open communicators and sociability. Although they may not appear to be the life of the party like the Interactive Styles, the Steadiness Styles draw attention from people just the same because they are good listeners. In addition, when they talk with other people, they always make sure that they express support and are able to understand the situation and emotions of the people they are in contact with. Their image of dependability and trustworthiness draw other people to open their hearts to the Steadiness Styles. In some instances, the Steadiness Styles appear to be passive and round about, allowing other individuals to see them as obedient and yielding. This kind of attitude allows them to draw other people who are willing to also listen to them and be trustworthy like the Steadiness Styles. In short, their goodness when it comes to listening and being trustworthy comes back to them as expressed by the people with the same attitude who will also listen to and support them willingly. The purpose of the Steadiness Styles in their daily living activities is to soothe them and find comfort in stability. As the name of the style expresses, steadiness is what they seek. They find solace in a well-adjusted life, and because of this, they tend to take life easy by going about it as leisurely as possible. The Steadiness Styles are careful enough not to do things or make decisions that would disrupt the stability of their life. Among the four personality styles mentioned in the DISC Platinum Rule Assessment, the Steadiness Styles are said to be slower-paced than usual. They take life one step at a time by thinking and rethinking their lives, decisions, actions over time and again. When it is time to make a decision, the Steadiness Styles depend on other people to help them make the right choices. This is brought about by their need to interact with people and gain their appreciation. The Steadiness Styles ask for opinions from other people and they think about all the options that are available before finally choosing one absolute path to take. When it is time to act out the decision, they still need to ask the impression of other people about the decision that she is about to make. In this attribute of the Steadiness Style, we can observe that they are overly dependent on other people, and they are constantly searching for social interaction, relationships, and involvement from other individuals. The assessment amusingly expressed that if we look at the work space of an individual who is a Steadiness Style, we would often see pictures of them with other people which greatly shows how they are attached to everyone they have encountered in their lives. Furthermore, this attachment to other people is manifested by their avoidance of disagreements. For the Steadiness Styles, they are most likely to live within a situation or an environment which is unpleasant to them, rather than be in a conflict with other people. As a result, the Steadiness Styles tend to say the things that other people want to hear or would agree with than express a genuine remark which they know would cause trouble between them and the people surrounding them. These desirable characters all in all will get them jobs that are appropriate to their attitudes such as a financial advisor, an insurance agent, a counselor, a teacher or a social worker, doctor or nurse, personal assistance, a customer service representatives, and the likes (as cited in the DISC Platinum Assessment report. Another aspect described by the report includes how the Steadiness Styles act in the work place. For these styles, they display desirable work characteristics and ethics because they courteous by showing respect to their superiors and colleagues, approachable, and responsible. We should remember that the Steadiness Styles are people-oriented; therefore, they are also good team players. They share tasks when asked to work with a team making them a valuable employee and colleague. As to the Steadiness Styles’ weaknesses, they are oversensitive and emotional, too submissive, slow-paced, and are unskilled in goal setting. For the Steadiness Styles to be able to counter their weaknesses and allow for improvement and development, the DISC Platinum Assessment report mentioned some pointers on how they may be able to continue improving their character. The Steadiness Styles should see to it that they are able to handle change in an accepting manner. Since their goal in life is to achieve steadiness, they are often shaken up by change causing them to be unsettled and unproductive. Change is a natural process that individuals cannot avoid; therefore, it is about time that the Steadiness Styles train themselves to handle change better. At some points in their lives, especially in the work place, everyone will be tasked to handle a leadership or managerial position. This would hurt the career of the Steadiness Styles if they are unable to pick themselves up and act accordingly to the changes that are required of them. In short, they should be able to handle stress and pressure that sudden changes eventually bring to them. The Steadiness Styles are also described as action-oriented. They are focused on doing and accomplishing things through action that they seem to lack in their logical thinking and analytical skills. It would help them a great deal if they learn how to think and analyze things by tapping into their creativity and innovativeness. They need to motivate themselves go beyond what they already know and discover a whole lot of unexplored ideas and thoughts that would contribute to their knowledge and experience, adding to their character and sense of being. When it comes to their interest in getting involved with other people and building relationships, they should keep in mind that they have their own identity and not depend so much on other people. As mentioned above in their characteristics, they avoid conflicts with other people by being passive and obedient. This is a weakness that should be changed in order to achieve greater potential. They should be comfortable with who they are, what they think, what they want to do, and what they want to say, even if it means that other people will not agree with them. This will help in self-empowerment and also strengthening their relationship with other people by being true with themselves and their family, friends, and colleagues. I do not entirely agree with results of this assessment because there are other characteristics in the report which I do not observe to be doing in my everyday life. I agree with the report because I actually do love company and I love meeting other people because I am interested to know who they are. However, I am more likely to express my opinion with other people even if I know they will not agree with me. Perhaps, I have surpassed my passiveness. In line with the issue though, I remember when I was younger, I would act passively with other people. I will not air comments or any other opinions, but rather, I listen to the remarks of other people. Now that I am older, I guess I have conquered that fear of rejection. I also agree with the report because I always see to it that everything in my life is in place. I do not like chaos, especially when I look at my life. I always want stability that is why I go to great lengths in order to achieve it. Overall, the DISC Platinum Assessment activity has been engaging because it mirrors, although not entirely, who I am, and it gives suggestions on how I should change myself in order to become a better person and in turn, achieve my life goals straightforwardly. How to cite DISC Platinum Rule Personality Assessment, Papers